Drumlines kill species of sharks which are no threat to humans and other harmless wildlife. There are concerns that these drumlines will attract the very sharks that we want to discourage. The money being spent could be very well spent on research for more effective strategies protecting both humans and sharks.
From the AMCS.
Shark
Wild
Other common names: Marketed as Flake, particularly in Victoria
Notes:
Gillnet, longline and trawl caught, depending on species and fishing location; slow-growing, long-lived and late-maturing group of species, producing few young, making all shark species vulnerable to fishing pressure; large declines in shark populations worldwide with several species listed as threatened with extinction by IUCN; School Shark is listed as a ‘conservation dependent’ threatened species under Commonwealth environment legislation; bycatch of dolphins and Australian sea lions has been an issue in the gummy shark fishery off SA – area closures are in place to reduce the impact of the fishery on these threatened species; many shark species e.g. tropical sharks are still caught without any stock assessments; shark meat also imported from poorly managed fisheries in Asia.
Of course, even sharks that do kill people are really lagging in the killing stakes. Perhaps the money that's being spent on drum lines would more effectively save lives if it was spent elsewhere, instead of posing an internationally illegal threat to an endangered species.
Nakill them all
ReplyDeleteIt is political. The government wants to be seen as doing something. The shark issue is the easiest thing to tackle compared to most things on the above list.
ReplyDeleteHobartian1 Well, the WA government is now seen as doing something stupid, but this seems to be a trend with Australian governments these days...
ReplyDeleteNa kill them all and that is that
ReplyDeleteGraham doesn't understand the ecological consequences of the absence of these animals, which is a pity. He is either willfully ignorant or a troll. I expect a certain level of literacy and courtesy here, if he continues to fall below it, he will be blocked.
ReplyDeleteEveryone gets so freaked about sharks. It really pecks at my nerves.
ReplyDeleteWell at least kill the 1 that all way stay in the shellos is that ok
ReplyDeleteDid you mean "At least kill the ones that always stay in the shallows"? Are there really sharks that always stay in the shallows? Are they a threat to people? Indiscriminately killing every shark is kind of irresponsible, sharks take a long time to breed and don't have many kids. We need sharks, they are the oceans clean up crew and are economically significant. The White Shark is more endangered and under greater protection than the Humpback Whale.
ReplyDeleteHi Alicia, I'm a bit anal so i was wondering where the stats came from. I'm not doubting the numbers, I've just been on the internet long enough not to automatically believe a picture with words on it until I can verify the information. Then I will share it all with the world!!!! Thanks for doing this, it certainly puts things into perspective.
ReplyDeleteThe person who made the image says they got them from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
ReplyDeleteThanks Alicia.
ReplyDeleteAh, found the full quote from T'Anne Mills - the creator of the poster, on Facebook as to where the figures come from +CrapzillaDeluxe, "The figures come from the ABS, Work Safe, Industry bodies and research organisations. Yes, I have rounded the larger figures DOWN to make the figures easier to understand. The whole point is that the whole "sharks are deadly" debate is a misconception. Yes, people are killed by sharks, but only 2 last year compared to some other very horrible ways to die."
ReplyDeleteIncidentally, this paper, or at least its abstract might be of interest - http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0066035
ReplyDeleteHe is starting to think, so respect that and move on.
ReplyDelete